TRANSPARENCY · SOURCING · CORRECTIONS
Editorial standards
How the Another AI Lie Editorial Team creates and maintains practical guidance about online verification, media evidence and AI-related signals.
Who publishes our guidance
Guides are published under the collective byline Another AI Lie Editorial Team. The team is responsible for choosing topics, checking cited material, editing for clarity and reviewing pages when relevant information changes.
The collective byline does not imply professional accreditation. Our guidance is educational and is not a substitute for legal, financial, academic, security or other specialist advice.
Why we publish
Our purpose is to help readers slow down, examine evidence and make proportionate decisions before believing or sharing online material. We avoid presenting a detector score or isolated visual clue as definitive proof.
How guides are prepared
- We define the practical question a reader is trying to answer.
- We consult primary or authoritative sources where they are available and link to useful references.
- We distinguish direct observations from interpretation and identify important uncertainty.
- We check that conclusions do not exceed the evidence described on the page.
- We review wording, links, metadata and page presentation before publication.
Use of AI tools
AI tools may assist with organising research, drafting, editing, formatting and quality checks. An AI output is not treated as a source. Published guidance is reviewed by the Another AI Lie Editorial Team, and responsibility for the final content remains with the team. The methodology page explains the current automated analysis, evidence-search process and limitations.
Sources and independence
We prefer original documents, official guidance and organisations with direct expertise. External links are selected for relevance; a link does not imply that the source endorses Another AI Lie.
The site may seek revenue through paid reports or advertising. Commercial considerations do not change the conclusions or sources presented in editorial guidance.
Corrections and updates
We aim to correct material errors promptly and update guidance when a change would materially affect a reader’s understanding. Guide pages display a review date so readers can judge how recently the content was checked.
To report an error, broken source or unclear statement, email support@anotherailie.com and include the page address and the issue you found.
Evidence before belief: responsible verification often ends with uncertainty. We would rather explain what cannot be established than offer confidence the available evidence does not support.