Skip to content
AI · MEDIA · ONLINE DECEPTIONEvidence before belief
← All examples

Scam messages · Worked scenario

An urgent message wants you to pay.

Check the sender and the claimed event before following a payment link.

Invented example for learning

A message claims a parcel cannot be delivered until you pay a small fee within thirty minutes. It uses a delivery company's name and includes a shortened link. You are expecting a parcel, so the story feels plausible.

What is actually known?

The message asks for payment under time pressure. Its claimed identity has not been verified. Expecting a parcel does not establish that this particular message came from the courier.

How to investigate it

  1. Keep the message's claim, sender identity and destination link as separate checks.
  2. Use the courier's established app or website independently to check the delivery, rather than opening the message's link.
  3. Compare the tracking details with your original order record.
  4. If you need clarification, use contact details from the established service, not from the suspicious message.
  5. Treat urgency, a small fee or polished branding as warning signs to investigate, not a complete verdict on their own.

Where the evidence stops

The scenario contains reasons for caution, but it is invented and has no real sender to investigate. A conclusion about a real message needs evidence about the actual sender, destination and delivery record.

This is an illustrative scenario, not a report about a real incident or a published verdict. No media, source record or detector result has been invented as evidence.

Take the next step

Check a suspicious email or message →

Check something of your own ↗Our methodology